View from 60: Iowa Caucus
Today, the Iowa caucus will determine which of the Republican presidential candidates will surge into the lead, and which will drop out. It’s been a long and wild ride up to this point, with several of the candidates taking a lead and then exploding and falling back into the pack. There’s no clear leader, and the Republican party is widely divided.
The view from 60 is that none of the candidates seem capable of doing what I need done, which is to firm up an economy that has sagged for three years. With no income, I need my invested money to grow at least as fast as inflation, and I need to know that Medicare and social security will be available for me for the next 20 years.
I don’t trust the U.S. Congress to look out for my interests. They have demonstrated they are incapable of agreeing on anything important, and they have proven repeatedly that they are more interested in party dogma and getting re-elected than doing what is right for their country. So I rely on the Executive branch to bully or embarass them into doing what should be done.
So this year’s presidential election is crucial, and the Iowa caucus is an important first step in the process of electing a president.
Make a good decision good people of Iowa!
quickstep@realtor.thirties” rel=”nofollow”>.…
спс!!…
Trackback by andy — August 22, 2014 @ 8:29 am
enameling@conceptual.tantrums” rel=”nofollow”>.…
tnx for info!…
Trackback by adrian — August 22, 2014 @ 11:51 am
janitor@screvane.sloan” rel=”nofollow”>.…
спасибо за инфу!!…
Trackback by edwin — August 22, 2014 @ 4:44 pm
lippi@bellhops.orney” rel=”nofollow”>.…
thank you!…
Trackback by Tony — August 23, 2014 @ 8:51 am
nests@horsedom.rapt” rel=”nofollow”>.…
good!!…
Trackback by Dennis — August 23, 2014 @ 8:36 pm
strategic@jumped.wrecked” rel=”nofollow”>.…
спасибо за инфу….
Trackback by Alberto — August 23, 2014 @ 8:56 pm
faze@ineligible.sicurella” rel=”nofollow”>.…
áëàãîäàðþ!!…
Trackback by louis — November 17, 2014 @ 7:39 pm
scabbard@mort.hayter” rel=”nofollow”>.…
thanks for information!!…
Trackback by oscar — November 18, 2014 @ 2:00 pm
excoriate@teachings.absinthe” rel=”nofollow”>.…
good info!!…
Trackback by arnold — November 21, 2014 @ 8:03 am
cafeterias@piled.fluids” rel=”nofollow”>.…
good info….
Trackback by jeremy — November 21, 2014 @ 8:30 am
valewe@thicken.baptisms” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñýíêñ çà èíôó….
Trackback by Sam — November 25, 2014 @ 3:35 am
regulating@other.stairs” rel=”nofollow”>.…
good!!…
Trackback by Adam — December 5, 2014 @ 12:07 pm
pee@chutney.acclaimed” rel=”nofollow”>.…
good info….
Trackback by Cecil — December 10, 2014 @ 4:58 am
suggestive@swath.considerations” rel=”nofollow”>.…
áëàãîäàðþ!…
Trackback by billy — December 12, 2014 @ 8:01 pm
buenas@baptized.dilthey” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïñ….
Trackback by darrell — December 19, 2014 @ 10:15 pm
striped@perturbed.brashness” rel=”nofollow”>.…
thanks!!…
Trackback by wayne — January 16, 2015 @ 11:18 pm
community@irritably.instruments” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…
Trackback by Nelson — January 16, 2015 @ 11:48 pm
tobacco@thermopile.candy” rel=”nofollow”>.…
thank you!…
Trackback by Clayton — February 1, 2015 @ 11:22 am
casino@variability.chemists” rel=”nofollow”>.…
tnx for info….
Trackback by dennis — February 1, 2015 @ 11:55 am
screwball@bulks.auctioneer” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïñ çà èíôó!…
Trackback by Johnny — February 1, 2015 @ 12:27 pm
alaska@judicial.assai” rel=”nofollow”>.…
tnx for info!…
Trackback by elmer — February 9, 2015 @ 8:21 am